By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Ethics questions valid; not priority
Other opinions
Placeholder Image

There are serious problems with Georgia’s ethics commission — or rather (excuse us), the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission. The eligibility of its chairman is not among them.
The Rome-based Ethics in Government Group filed a complaint alleging that the commission’s chairman, Camilla attorney Patrick Millsaps, is ineligible to continue holding that post because of a state law that prohibits any commission member from serving more than one full term.
It’s not a frivolous question. If there’s any realm of public service where the rationale for term limits is self-evident, it’s an unelected panel charged with the responsibility of registering lobbyists and investigating complaints of campaign finance impropriety and other government ethics issues.
But the issue of whether Millsaps has served a complete term is not a simple matter. He was appointed in 2009 by then-Gov. Sonny Perdue and reappointed this year by Gov. Nathan Deal. In between, the General Assembly passed, and Perdue signed into law, 2010 legislation that reorganized the ethics commission and set terms of service at two, three and four years for its various members.
Millsaps concedes that the legal question is not moot, and said he would in effect decline his reappointment and continue serving as a Perdue appointee until Deal names a replacement. That sounds like a reasonable compromise: State law allows a commission member whose term has expired to remain on the board until he or she is replaced, and it’s by no means settled that Millsaps’ term has ex-
Georgia’s radically downsized (except for its name) ethics oversight panel is grossly underfunded; its investigative capacity is all but nonexistent; and if the political connections and activities of some of its members aren’t flagrant conflicts of interest, they are remarkably convincing imitations.
Under the circumstances, the legitimate question about its chairmanship seems to have been handled appropriately for now.

— Online:

Sign up for our E-Newsletters