By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Pell grants expanding to benefit students in unlikely places
93555af8aa612c9448c9f5c5ecc11a9066eda2eab3ccb2b6df71034f2c2ad27a
The Department of Education unveiled a small-scale initiative to make Pell grants available to inmates, slightly reversing a decades long ban. - photo by Omar Etman
The Pell program, which awards grants mostly to undergraduate students receiving conventional college educations, is expanding to benefit non-traditional students in unlikely places.

Obama administration officials unveiled an initiative that would provide Pell grants to a limited number of state and federal prisoners the first time inmates could receive Pell grants since Congress excluded them from the program in 1994, The Washington Post reported.

The Pell program was established in 1972 to provide small grants to undergraduate students, the amount received dependent on financial need and other factors and, unlike a loan, grants do not have to be repaid. In 1993 the year before Pell grants became unavailable to inmates 3.3 million students received Pell grants and fewer than 1 percent were inmates, according to the Post.

Studies have proven that correctional education is beneficial for inmates. One review, from 1995, found that education in prison resulted in fewer disciplinary infractions and higher rates of post-release employment.

Another, the 2001 Three State Recidivism Study, conducted by the Department of Education, looked at the effect of correctional education on recidivism in the late 1990s. The findings were dramatic, the Marshall Project reported. Those who had participated in education programs were 29 percent less likely to return to prison within three years than those who hadnt. The RAND study, published in 2013, found prisoners to be 43 percent less likely to return.

Critics question the rationale of funneling funding to criminals and away from lawful citizens. When the measure to block prisoners from receiving Pell grants was up for debate in 1994, one representative commented, Law-abiding students have every right to be outraged when a Pell grant for a policemans child is cut but a criminal that the officer sends to prison can still get a big check.

Todays opponents are also frustrated the administration enacted the change without congressional approval.

How we ensure the long-term sustainability of the Pell Grant program needs to be a national conversation," said House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline, R-Minn., in a written statement. "Unfortunately, the administration has chosen once again to stifle an important debate by acting unilaterally and without regard for the law.

The Obama administration bypassed Congress by categorizing the pilot program under the auspices of the experimental sites initiative, which will allow the Department of Education to waive certain rules that govern financial aid, Inside Higher Ed explained.

Prison education advocates, who have gained momentum in recent years, have celebrated this first step. This test run of Pell grants for prisoners, if successful, could make it easier to pass a comprehensive prison education bill in Congress in the future.

For Dallas Pell, daughter of the late Sen. Claiborne Pell, for whom the program is named, prison education is an emotional issue.

When people get out of prison, the overwhelming majority of people who have gotten education in prison, theyre so profoundly changed, she told the Post. They go into their communities. They go into social work. Its in everybodys best interest to have people come out [of prison] that are rehabilitated and feel good about themselves.
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries