By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
The Buddhist belief supported by science
a93e8206ca5efce7dec93406cff71b435a43b01c11f7032f223dbb93a8fed89a
A new research paper shows that one of the main aspects of Buddhist belief is real. Here's why that's not so surprising. - photo by Herb Scribner
One of the core beliefs in Buddhism is that ones "self" is constantly changing, even if you feel like youve been the same person all your life.

It looks like science is now backing up that theory. A new research paper published in the academic journal CellPress found that the brain and body are, in fact, always changing.

"Buddhists argue that nothing is constant, everything changes through time, you have a constantly changing stream of consciousness, Evan Thompson, a philosophy of mind professor at the University of British Columbia, told Quartz. And from a neuroscience perspective, the brain and body is constantly in flux. Theres nothing that corresponds to the sense that theres an unchanging self."

The research found that people change as their brain physically changes, since the ability to change your 'self' isnt limited to one part of the brain, according to Quartz. So as parts of your brain grow and change, so do you.

"Self-processing in the brain is not instantiated in a particular region or network, but rather extends to a broad range of fluctuating neural processes that do not appear to be self specific," the studys authors wrote.

It's not surprising that science has proved an aspect of Buddhism. David Barash of Scientific American made the case that Buddhism is a science-friendly religion, since the Buddha never described himself as a god, and much of the Buddhist teachings are based off of writings about improving quality of life, rather than ways to embrace and live through a god or diety.

"[A]mong the key aspects of Buddhism, we find insistence that knowledge must be gained through personal experience rather than reliance on the authority of sacred texts or the teachings of avowed masters; because its orientation is empirical rather then theoretical; and because it rejects any conception of absolutes," Barash wrote.

Barash highlighted a quote from Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, in which the religious leader spoke about how Buddhists should embrace scientific discoveries, regardless of whether or not they relate to a Buddhist principle.

Suppose that something is definitely proven through scientific investigation, that a certain hypothesis is verified or a certain fact emerges as a result of scientific investigation, Gyatso said. And suppose, furthermore, that that fact is incompatible with Buddhist theory. There is no doubt that we must accept the result of the scientific research.

One of these scientific findings came in 2013, when a study found that people still experience a level of consciousness during deep meditation, something that Buddhists have long believed. In fact, Buddhists believe in nine levels of consciousness that are accessible through deep meditation.

But not everything between science and Buddhism matches up. For example, Buddhism touts the idea that the self and soul can exist without the human body, where as scientists dont think thats possible, Quartz reported.

Similarly, Buddhism promotes heavy amounts of meditation, which can have varying results for different people, according to John Horgan, the director for the Center for Science Writings at Stevens Institute of Technology.

In his 2003 Slate piece, and reaffirmed again in a 2011 blog post for Scientific American, Horgan made the case that meditation has proven to be no more helpful for peoples stress and well-being than sitting, despite Buddhist claims that it is a major vehicle for achieving enlightenment.

Still, Thompson, who has previously written and researched about Buddhism, told Quartz that he believes some aspects of Buddhism, including the idea of the self, exist.

In neuroscience, youll often come across people who say the self is an illusion created by the brain, Thompson said. My view is that the brain and the body work together in the context of our physical environment to create a sense of self. And its misguided to say that just because its a construction, its an illusion.
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries