By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
Obamas executive order on gun control sparks reaction from 2016 hopefuls
92de52f7fde823cf4aae640b673f681d9cc10d7ac566a2a574cbe569e2e6652c
On Tuesday, President Barack Obama announced an executive order to increase gun control for the United States. Here's what 2016 presidential candidates said about it. - photo by Herb Scribner
President Barack Obama announced a new executive order on Tuesday that will expand background checks and, he hopes, gun control across the United States.

The White House released details of the plan on Monday afternoon, detailing how the executive order will make gun sales easier to watch and will help people keep guns away from the mentally ill and people with criminal records, Quartz reported.

Specifically, the plan will require gun sellers at gun shows and on the Internet to have their own licenses, putting them at risk for five years in prison or a $250,000 fine if they dont, Quartz reported. The order also requires background checks for family and corporate trusts, which used to allow gun owners to pass their gun ownership down to another, Quartz reported.

But the plan isnt perfect, as it leaves out some parts of gun control that had previously been discussed by lawmakers. For example, it doesnt limit the sale of ammunition, nor does it ban automatic weapons.

Whether this sits well with all lawmakers remains to be seen. But it could be that the next president gets rid of the executive order. As Quartz reported, the next U.S. president could repeal the executive order.

Republicans have already vowed to fight the executive order, but how, exactly they could do so is not clear, although the next president could repeal it, Quartz reported. One tactic may be to refuse to fund the presidents 2017 budget, which includes spending for the ATF and FBI agents."

Repealing the new order seems to be the case for many potential presidential candidates. Heres a breakdown of what some of the 2016 candidates have said about Obamas latest executive order and what they plan to do with it if they are to take office.

Donald Trump

On the eve of the presidents executive order announcement, Republican front-runner Donald Trump warned voters about the increased background checks, telling CNN that pretty soon you wont be able to get guns. Its another step in the way of not getting guns.

Trump added that the key to stopping mass shootings is to increase the focus on mental health, and give people their own weapons to defend themselves.

If the people in Paris had guns, you know what, you wouldn't have had 134 people and many more to follow get killed," Trump told CNN. "And if people in California had guns, a couple of guns in that room, you wouldn't have had 16 people killed."

Trump said he would repeal the order if elected president.

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz

Meanwhile, Ted Cruz told Obama to back off on gun control, The Dallas Morning News reported. He said he isnt surprised by the executive order, but hes upset that the president will expand his powers again with this executive order.

The word that President Obama is once again going to abuse his power to try to seize our guns sadly surprises nobody, Cruz told The Dallas Morning News. This is a president who for seven years has abused his constitutional authority.

Cruz said guns, throughout history, have helped Americans defeat their enemies, and that he will personally repeal the executive order if he takes office, The Dallas Morning News reported.

Its entirely backwards. We dont beat the bad guys by taking away our guns. We beat the bad guys by using our guns. And whatever President Obama attempts to do, abusing his power on the Second Amendment, you can rest assured that on Jan. 20th, 2017, if I am elected president I will rescind every single illegal and unconstitutional executive order Barack Obama has entered.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio didnt mince words when asked about Obamas executive order. He plans to repeal it on the first day hes in office, Time magazine reported.

Dont worry, Rubio said. On my first day in office, behind that desk, dont worry, those orders are gone.

During a speech Sunday night in New Hampshire, Rubio said Obama is obsessed with gun control, which is meant to further erode the Second Amendment.

He also told reporters that the change goes against the U.S. Constitution, Time reported.

I believe that every single American has a constitutional and therefore God-given right to defend themselves and their families, Rubio said.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush took a different approach when speaking about Obamas new executive order he suggested that Obama should have taken the issue straight to Congress, something Bush tried to do in 2012 following the Sandy Hook shootings, Fox News reported.

The president has a pattern of taking away rights of citizens, Bush told Fox News on Sunday. The better approach would be to punish people who violate federal gun laws. If its such a great idea, let (Obama) go to Congress.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie

The New Jersey governor may have had the most rash statement about Obama's executive order. As CBS News reported, Christie called Obama a "petulant child" in regards to gun control.

Christie, who's long dealt with improving current gun control legislation, said he doesn't think the executive order will sit right with the American people, CBS reported. And though he didn't mention whether he would repeal the order if elected, he doesn't think the order will have a long life.

"I'm confident the courts will reject his attempts," Christie told CBS. "If they don't, I'm sure that ultimately the next president will make sure that he abdicates those extra constitutional actions."

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

Unlike Republicans, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton stood by Obamas call for executive action, saying shed keep the order if she were to become president, Politicus USA reported. She said she supports the use of more background checks, and the use of an executive order, especially when Congress wouldnt budge on making decisions on gun control.

I know that a Republican president would delight in the very first day, reversing executive orders that President Obama has made, including this one that we expect him to make, Clinton said, Politicus USA reported.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders

Fellow Democratic hopeful Bernie Sanders also supported Obamas plan to bypass Congress. He told CNN on Sunday that although he would have prefered both sides of the political spectrum to come together, Obamas actions makes sense if Republicans wont budge on the issue, The Huffington Post reported.

The vast majority of the American people are horrified by the mass shootings we have seen. They want action, Sanders said. What the president is trying to do now is to expand the instant background check by closing the gun show loophole. I think hes doing what the American people would like him to do.
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries