By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
How to stop robocallers from spamming your voicemail
9d0bb71e17bf165abeb6835d8be6ec0f9ab0cb49b61c25fd42210261f8e02d7d
The FCC may soon allow this annoying practice. There are a few things you can do to minimize the nightmare. - photo by Amy Iverson
I still have a landline in my home. I never answer it. But I do give the number to every store or online registration that requires a phone number. I take comfort in knowing that when that company starts calling the number with solicitations (and sells that number to other companies that will do the same), I can easily go through the old answering machine and delete away.

But now, I may have to do the same thing with my cellphone, and Im not happy about it. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering allowing any marketer to leave a straight-to-voicemail message on anyones cellphone. And the Republican National Committee supports it. Can you imagine seeing a red dot with the number 453 over your phone icon? Because I envision my phone getting so many voicemails that Im going to want to throw it into the nearest dumpster.

Now, federal law says any company that participates in robocalls must have written consent before contacting you via cellphone. But a company called All About the Message says its ringless voicemail technology should be an exception. The cellphone will never ring. Youll just get the notification that there is a voicemail waiting. The company says by simply depositing a voicemail on a voicemail service, it does not result in the kind of disruptions to a consumers life dead air calls, calls interrupting consumers at inconvenient times or delivery charges to consumers. But what about the waste of my time?

The National Consumer Law Center agrees that if the FCC condones the loophole of ringless voicemails, consumers will likely be overwhelmed. Imagine going through voicemail after voicemail offering everything from alarm systems to contests for Caribbean cruises and dont forget the inevitable messages from debt collectors, people begging for donations, and credit card companies. These organizations already make nearly 2.5 billion robocalls to smartphones every month.

Cant we just sign up on the Do Not Call Registry? The National Consumer Law Center believes it may not apply if these ringless voicemails are not considered to be actual calls.

In a joint letter, attorneys general from New York, Massachusetts and Kentucky are encouraging the FCC not to allow ringless voicemails. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman says, The federal government has a basic responsibility to protect American consumers. That certainly doesnt mean making it even easier for companies to spam them with costly, unsolicited, ringless robocalls.

The time for public comment to the FCC has already ended. So is there anything we can do to protect ourselves? Yes.

If you accidentally answer a robocall, hang up immediately. Dont utter a word. Dont push a button. Any interaction from you indicates your number is live and could lead to more calls.

Block the numbers associated with robocalls and robotexts. On iPhones, go to recent phone calls and tap the blue i information icon next to the number you want to block. Scroll to the bottom of the next screen and tap Block this Caller. For most Androids, you can add the number to Call Blocking under settings. Another possible Android option is to go to your call log. Hold down the number you want to block and select Block Number.

Make sure all your phone numbers are on the Do Not Call Registry. I found I had registered my landline when I moved in seven years ago. But I had never registered my mobile number. Its done now.

Download the Nomorobo app for iPhone (beta program available on Android). This app won a contest the Federal Trade Commission sponsored to combat the problem of companies spamming our phone lines. The app automatically blocks all robocalls, while still allowing notifications from schools or emergency agencies. You can sign up most landlines for free and pay $1.99 per device, per month, for smartphones. Theres a free 30-day trial, so if you are already burdened by one too many robocalls, give it a shot and see if it pays off for you.
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries