By allowing ads to appear on this site, you support the local businesses who, in turn, support great journalism.
How smart thermostats can save you money this summer
370450a142e0fa4d065dc0fa771977a9c08792d3c5d862ad6460b54c8d056c1a
If you haven't converted to a smart thermostat, it's time. You will save time, frustration, and likely some money along the way. - photo by Amy Iverson
My husband and I disagree over what temperature is comfortable, just like almost every other couple I know. Im always cold, and he is always hot. Sound familiar? His argument is that I can always put on more clothes, but its a little more difficult for him to take off all his clothes. Point taken. So, during the summer, I keep the thermostat set to 78 degrees, but its programmed to lower to 74 when he gets home from work.

The Department of Energy says Im doing it right.

It recommends 78 F as the temperature for optimal cooling and energy efficiency, but adds that our homes should only be that cool in the summer when we are home and awake. But the National Sleep Foundation says research shows that a cool room, around 65 degrees, will give us the best nights sleep. So you may need to decide what is most important to you. Some may choose sleeping comfortably over saving some cash.

Again, my husband prefers it colder than I would like when we sleep, so my Vivint Element Thermostat is set for 70 F at night, but we keep our windows open. Since we live in the mountains of Northern Utah, it dips into the 50s right now overnight, so our bedroom stays plenty cool (and I pile on the blankets).

Fast Company named Vivint Smart Home one of the most innovative companies of 2017, and its a great option for those who not only want a smart thermostat but a completely connected home as well. At CES 2017, Vivint announced an artificial intelligence element called Sky that will learn from your routine and adapt to it. By using the sensors in your home, Sky could predict when you're going to bed and change the thermostat automatically.

Making sure we are using our programmable thermostats the right way and setting them to the right temperatures can save us money. And switching over to a smart thermostat can also save us time.

Smart thermostats can work through Wi-Fi, and users have the option to program them with an app or online. Buying one may not necessarily save you any money compared to using a simple programmable thermostat, but smart thermostats make the whole process way easier. Plus, after the initial set up, you may never need to touch your thermostat again.

Review site CNET says theres no comparison: The best smart thermostat on the market is the Ecobee4. Its pricey at $245, but CNET touts its responsive touch display and a sensor that knows if someone is home.

The Ecobee4 integrates with pretty much any smart interface youre using (Apple HomeKit, IFTTT and Samsung SmartThings) and works as an Amazon Alexa speaker. Among other things, you can ask it for the weather, or sports scores, or to raise or lower the temperature in your home. Toms Guide also picks the Ecobee4 as the best smart thermostat, noting the sensor that makes sure every room is the right temperature.

For a more budget-friendly option, CNET recommends the Honeywell Lyric T5 for just over $100. This unit works with Apple HomeKit, so by using your phones location, it will know who is home and adjust temperatures accordingly. The Lyric T5 also works with Amazon Alexa.

When shopping for a smart thermostat, there something else to notice. One great feature is to buy one that gives you reminders to change air filters. Dust and other gunk build up, and if you dont change the filter, that stuff will get into the air conditioner and cause problems. Plus, a clogged air filter means less gloriously cool air is getting through. Energy Star recommends changing the air filter once a month, and wouldnt it be great if your thermostat reminded you to do it?
Sign up for our E-Newsletters
How to avoid 'sharenting' and other paparazzi parenting habits
ce406c66b9871a104ac24256a687e4821d75680dcfc89d9e5398939543f7f88f
A recent study revealed parents often spend up to two hours staging a single photo of his or her child to post online. - photo by Amy Iverson
Before having kids, some people just dont appreciate their friends baby posts. But after having a child of their own, three fourths of new parents jump right on the parental social media bandwagon. If you have become a member of this group, there are some rules to follow for posting responsibly.

Much of a parents worry is how to teach their children to use social media responsibly. We talk with our kids about privacy, oversharing, and setting restrictions on their devices to keep them safe. But parents themselves need to look in the digital mirror once in a while. Before having children, it doesnt take as much effort to think about what to post online. Its up to us to decide what we share about our own lives. But once you become a parent, there are many questions to think about regarding what is appropriate to post about your kids on social media.

In a recent survey, kids clothing subscription company Mac and Mia surveyed 2000 new parents to find out how they are documenting their kids lives on social media, and what concerns they may have.

First of all, people without children seem to feel a bit differently about the onslaught of baby pictures online than those who are parents. 18 percent of people say before they had kids, they were annoyed by their friends baby posts. But after having children of their own, 73 percent admit they post progress pictures of their little ones every single month.

Not only are new parents letting the world know each time their baby is a month older, but they are posting about their kids every few days or so. Men and women report they post 6-7 times per month about their baby.

And while 70 percent of new parents say the benefit of using social media is how easy it is to help family and friends feel involved, there are some downsides. Here are a few tips to avoid the pitfall of becoming paparazzi parents.

Dont miss the moment

In the Mac and Mia survey, some parents admitted to spending up to two hours to get the perfect shot of their baby. That seems a little extreme. New and old parents alike should be careful about spending so much time taking pictures and videos that they dont enjoy the moment. Years ago, I decided to never live an experience through my phone. A study by Linda Henkel, a psychology professor at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found that when people took pictures of objects in an art museum, they didnt remember the objects as well as if they simply observed them.

This photo-taking impairment effect can happen to parents as well. If we are so consumed by getting the perfect photo, we can miss out on the moment all together, and our memory of it will suffer.

Dont forget about privacy

60 percent of couples say they have discussed rules and boundaries for posting their babys photos, according to the Mac and Mia survey. Even so, men are 34 percent more likely to publish baby posts on public accounts. If parents are concerned about their childrens privacy, keeping photos off of public accounts is a given.

In the Washington Post, Stacey Steinberg, a legal skills professor at the University of Florida, and Bahareh Keith, a Portland pediatrician, wrote that sharing too much information about kids online puts them at risk. They write that all that sharenting can make it easier for data thieves to target out kids for identity theft. Check that your privacy settings are where they should be and never share identifying information like full names and birth dates.

Dont be paparazzi parents

36 percent of parents say they take issue when their childs photo is posted online by someone else. Responsible social media users will always ask permission before posting a photo of another child. But parents should also think about whether their own children will take issue with their own posted photos a few years down the road.

When parents are constantly snapping pictures and throwing them on social media, it can be easy to forget to pause and make sure the post is appropriate. I always use the billboard example with my kids. I ask them to picture whatever they are posting going up on a billboard in our neighborhood. If they are okay with that, then their post is probably fine. Parents should ask themselves this same question when posting about their children. But they should also ask themselves if their child would be OK with this post on a billboard in 15 years. If it would cause embarrassment or humiliation, it might be best to keep it private.

Once children reach an appropriate age, parents should include them in the process of deciding what pictures are OK to post. Researchers at the University of Michigan surveyed 10- to 17-year-olds and found children believe their parents should ask permission more than parents think they should. The kids in the survey said sharing happy family moments, or accomplishments in sports, school and hobbies is fine. But when the post is negative (like when a child is disciplined) or embarrassing (think naked baby pictures or messy hair), kids say to keep it off social media.
Latest Obituaries